The need for physical synthesis has been around since 90nm. It started because ofĭevice physics fundamentally changing as we move below 16nm. Not because of bad ICC2 or better Innovus software. This "tipping point" started happening at 16nm and is getting worse at 7nm What I wanted to point out is where you're half wrong in your RTL synthesis My group switched from ICC/ICC2 over to Innovus for 16nm PnR, but we keptĭC Graphical for our RTL synthesis. What you said here in your DAC'17 "Best of" report is half true and half Is now becoming a credible threat to Aart's Design Compiler monopoly. From the many user commentsīelow, it appears that Cadence Genus RTL, when paired with Innvous PnR, Happening in the RTL synthesis market, too. In PnR over the past few years - we might now be seeing a tipping point What makes this interesting is since Innovus has been eating ICC2's lunch Old Sci-Fi "The Butterfly Effect" story but for business. Now can have a large impact on future events. Subject: After 16nm benchmark, 7nm user swaps out DC-Graphical for Genus-RTLĪN RTL SYNTHESIS TIPPING POINT?: Roughly 17 years ago, a new businessīook came out, "The Tipping Point", that emphasized how little things
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |